About the Corpus | Associates | Current Projects | Publications | Maya Writing | Links    
Online Sites:
Seibal Info
Untitled Document
  • Panel 1
Untitled Document
  • Stela 1
Untitled Document
  • Stela 2
Untitled Document
  • Stela 3
Untitled Document
  • Stela 4
Untitled Document
  • Stela 5
Untitled Document
  • Stela 6
Untitled Document
  • Stela 7
Untitled Document
  • Stela 8
Untitled Document
  • Stela 9
Untitled Document
  • Stela 10
Untitled Document
  • Stela 11
Untitled Document
  • Stela 12
Untitled Document
  • Stela 13
Untitled Document
  • Stela 14
Untitled Document
  • Stela 15
Untitled Document
  • Stela 16
Untitled Document
  • Stela 17
Untitled Document
  • Stela 18
Untitled Document
  • Stela 19
Untitled Document
  • Stela 20
Untitled Document
  • Stela 21
Untitled Document
  • Tablet 1
   
  Untitled Document
Seibal: Stela 6
  Detailed View + Additional Views and Photos!
  Locate on Map
  Inscriptions
   
  Drawing page reference
  Photo page reference

LOCATION According to Arthes (1991, p. 84), he and his men extracted the main portion of the shaft from where it lay beneath a mahogany trunk 8 m in circumference. Maler recognized that it had been set centrally at the foot of the stairway up the west side of Structure A-10, which starts from a landing reached by five broad steps. The top of the shaft eluded all searches until 1964, when I found that it had been carried 27 m from where it fell, and reset upside-down, probably in the Postclassic Period. As such it is catalogued as Stela 22 (see Smith 1982, pp. 138,139), but treated here only as part of Stela 6.

CONDITION When knocked down, probably by a tree that fell nearly a thousand years ago, the lower portion of the stela fell on its face, and was thus protected from erosion. The right halves of three glyphs, however, became detached at some time from a cleavage plane that runs through the shaft at an angle of about 25 degrees to the front surface. Two pieces of the lost glyphs were found by the Seibal Project and cemented in place, but they have since fallen off and disappeared. The upper fragment, after removal and precarious resetting (Smith 1982, p. 138), also fell facedown. Three glyphs are fairly well preserved, four are badly damaged, and one has split off entirely. The original top is also badly damaged.

MATERIAL Limestone of markedly laminated texture.

SHAPE A well-shaped shaft with parallel sides; top of unknown form.

DIMENSIONS

HLC 2.55m
PB 0.40m
MW 0.85m
WBC 0.80m
MTh 0.27m
Rel 3.4cm

CARVED AREAS Front only.

PHOTOGRAPHS Graham. Note: part of the upper border is not shown, since the photo is of Stela 22 as re-erected with that portion set in the ground.

DRAWING Graham, based on field drawings corrected by artificial light, except for the two small fragments, the only record of which is photographic.

 

 

INSCRIPTIONS

 
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College